St. Helena Island, S.C. M.L. King Speaks on Violence

Speech Written on St. Helena’s Island, November 14, 1966 at Penn Center

Violence may murder the murderer, but it doesn’t murder murder.

Violence may murder the liar, but it doesn’t murder the lie; it doesn’t establish

Truth. Violence may even murder the dishonest man, but it doesn’t murder

Dishonesty. Violence may go to the point of murdering the hater, but it doesn’t

Murder hate. It may increase hate. It is always a descending spiral leading nowhere.

Martin Luther King

This is the ultimate weakness of violence: It multiplies evil and violence in the universe.

It doesn’t solve any problems.

Did Emperor Constantine Save Christians from Islam?

The spread of Christianity was dying out at the beginning of the second century, many of them were Essenes, who believed in celibacy.  Had it not been for one man, Paul of Tarsus, a Pharisee, who converted to Christianity on the basis of a vision of Jesus that he claimed to see while on the road one day.  In this vision he was told to spread the word of Christianity. Being a Jew, he realized that the fate of the faith lay not with the Jews but with the non Jews. 

Paul sold to the pagan world the moral dream of Judaism — love, fairness, honesty, and monotheism.  He was also telling of the coming of redemption of the world with the second coming of Jesus which he believed was imminent.  The appeal to non Jews and others went to many that were vassals or slaves beholden to Rome, where human freedom was unimaginable.  The new Christian message changed the world with  the idea of human freedom grounded in Jewish moral values, and in a life style that professed that slaves were as good as masters; that the poor was as good as the rich; and  that the weak were as great as the mighty.  Christianity offered a new, much more appealing vision of the world, promoting a simple viewpoint of life, love, and religion.

 Christianity was one of many religious groups that existed in the Roman Empire for centuries, however, the Roman government viewed them with suspicion and persecution for the refusal to conform, as a result followers were tortured and punished.  The Roman persecutions failed to make Christians conform, it merely created Christian martyrs which inspired futher oppositon against Rome.   Ultimately, the persecutions failed to destroy Christianity,  it was around 311, Constantine found the persecutions he witnessed to be disturbing.  He realized that the persecutions had failed and caused disharmony; secondly, he had a deep admiration for the values of Christians.  He believed that their love, charity, and mercy would bring about unity and harmony to the Roman Empire.  Constantine decided to proceed with caution to Christianize the empire.  

In 313, Constantine came to an agreement with the Eastern emperor, Licinius which resulted in the Edict of Milan.  Through his church, Constantine controlled the Christians in his empire.  The church was legitimized and legalized. The majority of people were pagans who held control over the empire, but his new policies worked to weaken the pagan communities through his new practices. Constantine confiscated the precious metals of pagan temples to fill his treasury for his builiding projects. By the end of his reign in 337, Constantine succeeded in crippling paganism, making Christainity the official religion of the Roman Empire.

As the first Christian emperor, Constantine changed the world forever.  He laid the foundation for many emperors to follow him in the future.  The rise of Christainity over paganism was probably inevitable, he did much to hasten the process.  As a result, the medieval ages and much of Europe became Christian thanks to him.

Had Constantine decided to promote paganism or Islam for the betterment of the Roman Empire, could today’s Christians be Muslms?

The Cold War and Today’s Preppers

atomicbomb1957

 

The social and cultural phenomena of “prepping” for the eventuality of a catastrophic event in the United States has its roots in the “Cold War” in the 1950’s.

In the 1950’s  just as today, American information experts are faced with the realities of engaging the American public in a nationalistic purpose to promote our democratic freedom and economic prosperity in the face of gender inequality, economic disparity, and racial segregation. The challenge then: how could the propagandists rally the country in spite of those glaring injustices?

Please note, those schoolbombdrill1957
propagandists were not cynical strategists, but believed strongly in the virtue of their cause and of the struggle against the Soviet Union.

So a narrative was built that trumpeted the accomplishments of democratic capitalism, downplayed domestic problems, and justified the U.S. actions in the “Cold War.”   Furthermore, they presented an idealized vision of the United States as having a necessary role in combating the greater danger of Soviet communism. It was implied by the government strategists through a narrative to the American people that our country was destined to save the world from the evils of communism..

Furthermore, in the 1950’s the fear of a nuclear war and the effects of nuclear fallout was fresh in the minds of America’s in the aftermath of the atomic bombs dropped on Japan in August of 1945. School children were drilled religiously as they marched to air raid shelters and were told to take cover for their lives.  People built home-made versions of shelters as the paranoia of a Soviet nuclear attack swept the country.  Nike  sites were built and manned in and around major cities to intercept an attack,while our country began to build an arsenal of nuclear weapons that could destroy the world many times.  As a child,  recalling the adults sitting around the table discussing the  worst case scenarios of war with the Soviets was a commonplace event.

What was the purpose of the The “Cold War?”  The answer can not be simplified, and there isn’t space to discuss it here.   Yet today, we live peacefully with many communist countries, excepting North Korea. Did a cold war need to happen to bring about our current relationship with other communist governments?  I believe not.

Today the “preppers” are living out such a narrative. Is this current narrative valid and reliable?  Do emotions cloud the subject and its rationality?  Today’s “preppers” feel many of the same feelings that were felt during the 1950’s; fear, frustration, and a unifying purpose against some evil in the world. These  reasons are important and  understandable for we are living in a country where the current narrative about terrorism has  created signs of paranoia.  Could a look into the past provide some perspective? Is our country creating a narrative against terrorism to divert our citizens from addressing the current social injustices in our society? How would you compare or contrast the 1950’s with today?    How do you see it?

 

1950--000tthtytyty-fallout-shelter-NYC

 

 

 

 

Slavery: More Dirty Little Tricks

On March 2, 1807, President Jefferson signed a bill to abolish slave trade.  The congressional debates surrounding this bill show how legislators found it hard to cope with moral issues as they competed with commercial interests in the abolition of the importation of slaves In a nutshell, the bill found commercial and legal concerns taking precedence over the moral and humanitarian issues around the slave trade. Trade continued and grew within the United States.
The invention of the cotton gin impacted slave trade beyond the vision of this bill, also slaves continued to be illegally smuggled into ports like Charleston, S.C. being sold privately. Across the Atlantic Ocean slavery remained legal in most of the British Empire until the Slavery Act of 1833.
Britain used its international strength to put pressure on other nations to end their own slave trade. Britain created fines for captains that continued with the trade. The fines could be up to 100 pounds per slave found on a ship. Captains would sometimes dump slaves overboard when they saw Navy ships coming in order to avoid these fines.  The Royal Navy controlled the world’s seas,and established the West African coast as an area to board ships.amistead

Antebellum Slavery: The Politics, Economics, and Dirty Little Tricks

Image

dyingslave

Slave States 1860

Slave States 1860

  The antebellum period in American history ranged from 1830-1860.  It was a period of wide spread slavery in the country.  President Jefferson, Madison, and Monroe were Virginia plantation owners who supported the use of slaves on their plantations.  The question of abolishing slavery continued to be a strong political issue for the South.  With the invention of the Cotton Gin, and the lucrative textile markets abroad, slave labor became an important part of the successful cotton economy.  Cotton was king!  It created wealth and prestige for the slave owners farming cotton.      All of the presidents leading up to Lincoln found ways to avoid ending slavery.  The most important question is how slavery and prejudice have interacted to create the set of social relationships steeped in our current, hierarchical society.

Religion and the Founding of the American Republic

Religion and the New Republic of America

Religion played a major role in the American Revolution by offering a moral sanction for opposition to the British–an assurance to the average American that revolution was justified in the sight of God. As a recent scholar has observed, “by turning colonial resistance into a righteous cause, and by crying the message to all ranks in all parts of the colonies, ministers did the work of secular radicalism and did it better.”
Many Revolutionary War clergy argued that the war against Britain was approved by God. In his sermon Abraham Keteltas celebrated the American effort as “the cause of truth, against error and falsehood . . .the cause of pure and undefiled religion, against bigotry, superstition, and human invention . . .in short, it is the cause of heaven against hell–of the kind Parent of the Universe against the prince of darkness, and the destroyer of the human race.”

Religion was considered by many as the cause of the American Revolution.  Many Tories believed in a pamphlet of 1778 that it was religious quarrel.  A quarrel caused by Presbyterians and Congregationalists whose “principles of religion and politics were equally averse to those of  the established Church and Government of England. Jonathan Mayhew, Pastor of the West Church in Boston, delivered a sermon in support of the resistance to King Charles I.  He believed it was morally right for political and military resistance to rise against the King.  It was his Christian duty to celebrate the anniversary of the execution of King Charles I.

Resistance to Tyranny as a Christian Duty

Resistance to Tyranny as a Christian Duty

187190_100000714728150_5168241_q